was held on March 13 as part of a student concert of the Music School hallein a private viewing of my images: instead abstract, rhythmic colored shapes . This picture was painted especially for this concert tonight.
music - paintings (a short viewing)
common:
are linguistically distinct, it signals a connection and communication. such an instrument has a timbre and paint-box there are different shades. a guitar but also an image have a certain mood. with the picturesque name 'coloratura' is the coloration and decoration in the music, meant especially in singing. musicians often associate sounds with colored and painters create their works during and after music. I also got my inspirations for intensive listening. piece of music and images have an internal structure, are characterized by pointings, repeats, overlays, etc. from. in both genres we speak the same way of lines, surfaces or voltage. the pauses and omissions, the spaces and their structure as the example from the front and provide background in both cases the frequency of the rhythm.
different:
there is first the art of perception: sound is transported through the air element. we breathe it were music to our ears deep in our soul into it. look on the other hand, is directed light that is refracted at the surface and is reflected in our eyes. this shows a fundamental distance to the object, however, music penetrates us, we are that close. We can close our eyes closed and images visually lock away. with sounds and noises we can not do that, because our hearing is not comparable with fitted locking mechanism, which of course can also be uncomfortable if we inadvertently and unintentionally annoying noise or sprinklers are exposed to music.
a musical work is composed and then performed by musicians with their instruments. this music has on the one hand something changeable, something the other hand, volatile, but indestructible repeatable. sounds and sound works are alive and dynamic. building works are in contrast to static, they are given by the composer himself and remain in this form existentially rigid; go in its material manifestation, they are destructible and can also be lost forever.
for the music has its own notation, after which a can interpret the trace factory. a similar symbolic description language has the painting not, therefore non-binding. a deaf composer can thus create still works. a blind painter can no longer so in principle.
when I listen to most music, I have the impression as if it had always existed, as coming from a primeval over to us. music that penetrates me, has something for me usually (he) clarifying and comforting, it has the character of a living answer to that. But if I go into a museum and look at the exhibits, I sign their silent distance to my eyes, and something challenging in their existence affects the head. images therefore have to ask me more like a living at this. this is perhaps the fact that images in different frames to the music one, have a limit and they are wondering how it looks behind the scenes well and continues to formally imposes.
speak as both art forms two sides of human existence in a surprisingly complementary and holistic art and meet together on a basic need of human meaning in life.
music - paintings (a short viewing)
common:
are linguistically distinct, it signals a connection and communication. such an instrument has a timbre and paint-box there are different shades. a guitar but also an image have a certain mood. with the picturesque name 'coloratura' is the coloration and decoration in the music, meant especially in singing. musicians often associate sounds with colored and painters create their works during and after music. I also got my inspirations for intensive listening. piece of music and images have an internal structure, are characterized by pointings, repeats, overlays, etc. from. in both genres we speak the same way of lines, surfaces or voltage. the pauses and omissions, the spaces and their structure as the example from the front and provide background in both cases the frequency of the rhythm.
different:
there is first the art of perception: sound is transported through the air element. we breathe it were music to our ears deep in our soul into it. look on the other hand, is directed light that is refracted at the surface and is reflected in our eyes. this shows a fundamental distance to the object, however, music penetrates us, we are that close. We can close our eyes closed and images visually lock away. with sounds and noises we can not do that, because our hearing is not comparable with fitted locking mechanism, which of course can also be uncomfortable if we inadvertently and unintentionally annoying noise or sprinklers are exposed to music.
a musical work is composed and then performed by musicians with their instruments. this music has on the one hand something changeable, something the other hand, volatile, but indestructible repeatable. sounds and sound works are alive and dynamic. building works are in contrast to static, they are given by the composer himself and remain in this form existentially rigid; go in its material manifestation, they are destructible and can also be lost forever.
for the music has its own notation, after which a can interpret the trace factory. a similar symbolic description language has the painting not, therefore non-binding. a deaf composer can thus create still works. a blind painter can no longer so in principle.
when I listen to most music, I have the impression as if it had always existed, as coming from a primeval over to us. music that penetrates me, has something for me usually (he) clarifying and comforting, it has the character of a living answer to that. But if I go into a museum and look at the exhibits, I sign their silent distance to my eyes, and something challenging in their existence affects the head. images therefore have to ask me more like a living at this. this is perhaps the fact that images in different frames to the music one, have a limit and they are wondering how it looks behind the scenes well and continues to formally imposes.
speak as both art forms two sides of human existence in a surprisingly complementary and holistic art and meet together on a basic need of human meaning in life.
